COURSE: INTRODUCTION IN SYSTEM DESIGN: STRUCTURAL APPROACH,
Sept. 2005 ... Jan. 2006 (Fall 2005)
TIME: January 16, 2006
VERY GOOD STUDENTS:
1. Alexander V. Safonov (group 211), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (excellent: allocation of devices in communication networks),
7, 8 (excellent)
2. Dmitry Yu. Mikhin (group 211), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4 (good example), 5 (very prospective applied example),
6, 7, 8 (excellent)
3. Nikolai G. Ryabykh (group 211), lab. works: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
4. Viet Hung Nguen (group 215),
lab. works: 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
(combinatorial algorithm and program)
5. Konstantin V. Trushin (group 212), lab. works:
1 (static server), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
6. Dmitry V. Akhmetov (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (cross-entropy method for TSP)
7. Vladimir A. Saranchin (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (good),
9 (cross-entropy method for N-Queen Problem)
8. Anatoly A. Mukhin (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9 (cross-entropy method for 'the maze problem')
10. Nguen Quang H. Nguen (group 215), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (air-traffic management)
11. Van H. Pham (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9 (Pareto-approach & Evaluation upon ordinal scale for problem
"Internet-shop")
12. Andrew Revenko (group 211), lab. works:
1 (morphological synthesis is based on
direct multicriteria comparison;
discrete space of system excellence is not used),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (excellent, to present at a conference),
9 (materials on graph coloring problem)
13. Alexamder M. Novikov (group 217), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
14. Igor V. Romanov (group 216), lab. works: 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9 (cross-enropy method for applied TSP)
15. Michael Muravjev (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (cross-entropy mehtod for TSP)
16. Michael S. Zhilin (group 211), lab. works: 1 (design of OS Kernel),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (good example: Operation system),
8 (good example for project management: allocation of tasks)
17. Igor Kamyshnikov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (design of 3D game),
2 (modular programs), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (good example: developing Java Class),
8 (good example for memory equipments)
18. Dmitry Yu. Omeljchenko (group 211), lab. works:
1 (large scale communication system),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
REPORTS ON LAB. WORKS:
1. Maxim L. Milkov (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
2. D.I. Smirnov (group 211), lab. works:
1, 2 (excellent applied example), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
3. Kirill V. Bochkarev (group 212), lab. works:
1 (not finalized: discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
4. Sergey V. Kablov (group 217), lab. works:
1 (only structure of a systems, work is not finalized:
multicriteria ranking if alternatives,
morphological synthesis),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (good applied example)
5. Dmitry R. Lisin (group 217), lab. works:
1 (not finalized: discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6(excellent example: to prepare an article), 7, 8
6. Evgeny V. Shabashov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
7. Alexander S. Orlovsky (group 215), lab. works:
1 (example is very simple, morphological synthesis is not used),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 , 8 (good example)
8. Alexey I. Peshkov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (excellent: Spripting Module), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (excellent)
9. Alexey V. Sidorov (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
10. Evgeny B. Koptubenko (group 217), lab. works:
1 (example is excellent)
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
11. Yuri V. Timenkov (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
12. Roman M. Tverdohleb (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
13. Alexey S. Sherbakov (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
14. Danila Yu. Klokov (group 216), lab. works: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
15. Alexander B. Miller (group 216), lab. works:
1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
16. Vadim V. Kopytin (group 217), lab. works:
1 (final part is not right, without discrete space of system quality),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (allocation problem is absent)
17. V.V. Kostenko (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
18. Victor G. Fink (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
19. Vladislav V. Yatsun (group 216), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
20. Ilya A. Ivanov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
21. Artem A. Samoilov (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
22. Sergey V. Musienko (group 217), lab. works:
1 (not finalized:
morphological synthesis,
discrete space of system excellence), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
23. Konstantin B. Kabanov (group 216), lab. works:
1 (only system structure and alternatives,
work is not finalized:
multicriteria ranking of alternatives,
morphological syntehsis,
discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (OK)
24. Dmitry A. Matskevich (group 211), lab. works:
1 (morpological synthesis is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
25. Vasily N. Yurkevich (group 217), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
26. Roman A. Gorbachev (group 215), lab. works:
1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
27. Grigory V. Mokin (group 216), lab. works:
1 (not finalized), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
28. Ilya D. Klabukov (group 215), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
29. Artem A. Paladuk (group 215), lab. works:
1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
30. Gregory L. Bystrov (group 212), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
31. Nikita S. Ershov (group 215), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
32. Valentin V. Bekshtrev (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
33. Anton V. Gladkov (group 215), lab. works:
1 (not finalized: morphological synthesis,
discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
34. Kira S. Galkina (group 215), lab. works:
1 (hierarchical morphological design is not described),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
35. Evgeny E. Hatjko (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
36. Mikhail G. Karliuk (group 216), lab. works:
1 (good example, not finalized), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
37. Irina A. Obuhova (group 215), lab.works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (applied example is good, allocation problem is absent)
38. Grigory E. Sokolov (group 215), lab. works:
1 (not finalized), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
39. Ilya V. Tezin (group 214), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
40. Denis S. Yolkin (group 217), labl works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
41. Evgeny D. Protasenko (group 217), lab. works:
1 (not finalized:
morphological synthesis, discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
42. Sergey P. Pozdeev (group 215), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
43. Lenar D. Nizameev (group 214), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
44. Denis S. Latyshev (group 215), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
45. Vladimir V. Savin (group 215), lab. works:
1 (not finalized), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
46. B.A. Ontaev (group 212), lab. works:
1 (excellent), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
47. Roman D. Grigorov (group 217), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
48. Alexey M. Matveev (group 217), lab. works:
1 (discrete space of system excellence is absent),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation proble is absent)
49. Alexander A. Kondrashin (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
50. Sergey A. Smogley (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
51. M.A. Lebedev (group 214), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
52. Pave; A. Baikov (group 212), lab. works;
1 (not finalized), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (allocation problem is absent)
53. Vitaly S. Lyaper (group 217), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
54. Tigran T. Kavanosyan (group 211), lab. works
(joint organization of reports is very good):
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
55. A.A. Sorokin (group 214), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
56. I.I. Stanislavchuk (group 216), lab. works:
1 (not finalized:
(i) multicriteria ranking of alternatives,
(ii) morphological synthesis,
(iii) discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (allocation problem is absent)
57. Vadim Pidonenko (group 211), lab. works:
1 (good example),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
58. S.E. Bekshanov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (not finalized: morphological synthesis),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
59. Evgeny Yu. Nacu (group 217), lab. works:
1 (only system structure & alternatives, example is good),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8 (allocation problem is absent)
60. Sergey A. Demin (group 211), lab. works:
1 (only system structure and alternatives),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8
61. Pavel N. Volkov (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
62. O.E. Anziferov (group 211), lab. works:
1 (not finalized:
morphological synthesis, discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
63. A.U. Chidziev (group 211), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
64. Dmitry Ivanov (group 212), lab. works:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
65. Leonid Tolokolnik (group 216), lab. works:
1 (not finalized:
morphological synthesis,
discrete space of system excellence),
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
